Din dili açısından dinî semboller bize ne söyler
Yükleniyor...
Dosyalar
Tarih
2023-01-01
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Batman Üniversitesi
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Bu çalışma, dil felsefesi bağlamında din dilinin mahiyeti, teistik ifadelerin doğruluğunu,
anlamlılığını ve mantıkî statülerinin belirlenmesini, dinî söylemin semboller üzerindeki etkisini, dinî
sembollerle teistik metinler üzerinden Tanrı hakkında konuşmanın mümkün olup olmadığını, felsefi
bir bakış açısıyla tartışmayı hedeflemektedir. Dinî sembolizm, anlam açısından esas argümanlarını
konumlandırırken, probleme sadece dil açısından değil, dinin mahiyetinin ne olduğunu da göz önünde
bulundurur. Bu bağlamda sembollerin amacı, sosyal ve kültürel olarak içerdiği manayı, dinî ve dinî
olmayan formların doğrudan delaletleri yanında, sanatsal, dilsel, estetik ifadeleri, dolaylı ve ima
yoluyla bizlere iletmektir. Bu temel mana ile sembolik anlam arasındaki ilişkiye baktığımızda görürüz
ki, anlaşılır ufuk açıcı bir manaya kavuşabilmek için sembolik ve derunî anlam dünyasına girmeden bu
durumun gerçekleşmesi mümkün görünmemektedir. Düşünürler teolojik dil ekseninde kutsal
metinlerin dilini anlamada kendi felsefi sistemleri içerisinde çeşitli yaklaşımlar geliştirmişlerdir. Bu
konuda temel sorun, metafizik alana dair meselelerin bu dünyadaki insana ait olan dilin semboller
üzerinden nasıl kullanılması ve gerektiğidir.
This study aims to discuss, from a philosophical point of view, the nature of the language of religion in the context of language philosophy, the accuracy, significance and logical status of theistic expressions, the effect of religious discourse on symbols, whether it is possible to talk about God through theistic texts with religious symbols. While positioning its main arguments, religious symbolism considers the problem not only in terms of language, but also what the nature of religion is. In this context, the purpose of the symbols is to convey the meaning they contain to us indirectly and by implication, as well as the direct indications of religious and non-religious forms, as well as artistic, linguistic, aesthetic expressions. When we look at the relationship between this basic meaning and the symbolic meaning, we see that it does not seem possible to realize this situation without entering the world of symbolic and deep meaning in order to achieve a solid, seminal meaning. When we look at the issue from the point of view of philosophy of religion, it is seen that there is a serious language confusion between people in many subjects related to philosophy, anthropology and religion. It becomes a necessity to focus on these issues in detail and to carry out sensitive researches/studies on the language of religion. In every period of history, problems related to religion and the position of theological statements have always been the subject of discussion among thinkers. Discussions that focused on the nature of religion in the context of religious language, have focused on the logical status of religious propositions in the modern period. This situation has led to the need to reconsider religious propositions with today's experience. Thinkers have developed various approaches within their own philosophical systems in understanding the language of sacred texts on the axis of theological language. The main problem in this regard is to understand how the metaphysical issues should be used through symbols that belong to this world and human language.
This study aims to discuss, from a philosophical point of view, the nature of the language of religion in the context of language philosophy, the accuracy, significance and logical status of theistic expressions, the effect of religious discourse on symbols, whether it is possible to talk about God through theistic texts with religious symbols. While positioning its main arguments, religious symbolism considers the problem not only in terms of language, but also what the nature of religion is. In this context, the purpose of the symbols is to convey the meaning they contain to us indirectly and by implication, as well as the direct indications of religious and non-religious forms, as well as artistic, linguistic, aesthetic expressions. When we look at the relationship between this basic meaning and the symbolic meaning, we see that it does not seem possible to realize this situation without entering the world of symbolic and deep meaning in order to achieve a solid, seminal meaning. When we look at the issue from the point of view of philosophy of religion, it is seen that there is a serious language confusion between people in many subjects related to philosophy, anthropology and religion. It becomes a necessity to focus on these issues in detail and to carry out sensitive researches/studies on the language of religion. In every period of history, problems related to religion and the position of theological statements have always been the subject of discussion among thinkers. Discussions that focused on the nature of religion in the context of religious language, have focused on the logical status of religious propositions in the modern period. This situation has led to the need to reconsider religious propositions with today's experience. Thinkers have developed various approaches within their own philosophical systems in understanding the language of sacred texts on the axis of theological language. The main problem in this regard is to understand how the metaphysical issues should be used through symbols that belong to this world and human language.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Din Felsefesi, Din, Dil, Din Dili, Dinî Sembolizm, Philosophy of Religion, Religion, Language, Language of Religion, Religious Symbolism
Kaynak
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
6
Sayı
2
Künye
Polat, S. (2023). Din dili açısından dinî semboller bize ne söyler. Batman Akademi Dergisi, 6 (2), ss. 226-242.
