The validity and reliability of the turkish version of the onlinecounseling and face to face counseling attitudes scale
Yükleniyor...
Dosyalar
Tarih
2014-09
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States
Özet
The purpose of this study is to examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Online
Counseling Attitudes Scale (OCAS) and Face‐to‐Face Counseling Attitudes Scale (OCAS) (Rochlen,
Beretvas, & Zack, 2004). OCAS and FCAS loaded on four factors and the factors were named Value
of Online Counseling (OC‐V), Discomfort with Online Counseling (OC‐D), Value of Face‐to‐Face
Counseling (FC‐V) and Discomfort with Face‐to‐Face Counseling (FC‐D). The results of confirmatory
factor analysis indicated that the four dimensional model was well fit (x²=323.61, df=157, p=0.00000,
RMSEA=.056, NFI=.94, CFI=.96, IFI=.96, RFI=.92, GFI=.91, and SRMR=.071). Factor loadings ranged
from .47 to .88. The internal consistency coefficients of four subscales were .84, .80, .88 and .78.
Overall, findings demonstrated that OCAS and FCAS may be used as a valid and reliable instrument
in order to assess attitudes toward online counseling and face to face counseling of individuals.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Online Counselling, Attitudes, Validiy, Reliability, Scale Adaptation
Kaynak
WoS Q Değeri
Scopus Q Değeri
Cilt
1
Sayı
1
Künye
Manap, A., Demirci, İ., Şar, A.H. (2014). The validity and reliability of the turkish version of the onlinecounseling and face to face counseling attitudes scale. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies,1(1), pp.15-22. https://dx.doi.org/10.17220/ijpes.2014.01.002
